Because of the public interest in the matter-and to clear up confusion over it-the department is asking a judge to unseal the documents. Garland said that he personally approved the decision to seek a search warrant, and he also pointed out that the Department of Justice did not publicize the search the former president did. Had Trump wanted to release them, he could have…and he still can, at any time.Ĭontrary to right-wing reports, Trump’s lawyer was at Mar-a-Lago during the search, which a federal court authorized after finding probable cause. He also confirmed that copies of the warrant and the property receipt were left with Trump, as regulations require. This afternoon, Attorney General Merrick Garland gave a brief press conference in which he announced that the unjustified attacks on the Department of Justice (DOJ) have led it to file a motion to unseal the search warrant the FBI used and a redacted version of the receipt for the things removed from the premises. "Absent a full overhaul of Section 702 and related surveillance powers, Congress should not allow the law to be extended past this year.Since Monday’s search of former president Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property by the FBI, Trump, Trump supporters, and right-wing media have all been accusing the government of executing a political vendetta and speculating that FBI agents might have planted evidence on the property. "The systemic misuse of this warrantless surveillance tool has made FISA 702 as toxic as COINTELPRO and the FBI abuses of the Hoover years," he added. "Even with the long history of FBI misuse of FISA 702, these latest revelations should set off alarm bells across Congress," Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the Center for Democracy and Technology's Security and Surveillance Project, said in a statement. While the FBI has said it has implemented several changes to prevent Section 702 abuse, including better query training and stricter approval requirements for some "sensitive" searches, like those involving American elected officials and journalists, Section 702 opponents argue that the spying on US citizens won't stop unless Congress enacts FISA report. It's said that more than 23,000 queries were run on people suspected of storming the Capitol. UK's GDPR replacement could wipe out oversight of live facial recognitionĪdditional "significant violations of the querying standard" occurred in searched related to the Janubreach of the US Capitol, domestic drug and gang investigations, and domestic terrorism probes, according to the court. China has 50 hackers for every FBI cyber agent, says Bureau boss.Supreme Court not interested in hearing about NSA's super-snoop schemes.Feds rethink warrantless search stats and – oh look, a huge drop in numbers. In the latter, "the analyst who ran the query advised that the campaign was a target of foreign influence, but NSD determined that only eight identifiers used in the query had sufficient ties to foreign influence activities to comply with the querying standard," the opinion says, referring to the Justice Department's National Security Division (NSD). In other words, there wasn't a strong enough foreign link to fully justify the communications search.įor the Black Lives Matter protests, the division determined that the FBI queries "were not reasonably likely to retrieve foreign intelligence information or evidence of a crime." Again, an overreach of foreign surveillance powers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |